Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Former Student Says Obama Did Not Teach Judicial Review Constitutional Law At Univ Of Chicago: He Taught Course On Supreme Court's Expansion of Civil Liberties

From Truth On The Market Blog, "My Professor, My Judge, and the Doctrine of Judicial Review" by Thom Lambert:
my own constitutional law professor [President Obama] had stated that it would be “an unprecedented, extraordinary step” for the Supreme Court to "overturn" a law [i.e., the Affordable Care Act] ..., saying that it would be "unprecedented" and "extraordinary" for the Supreme Court to strike down a law that violates the Constitution is like saying that Kansas City is the capital of Kansas. Thus, a Wall Street Journal editorial queried this about the President who "famously taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago": "[D]id he somehow not teach the historic case of Marbury v. Madison?"

I actually know the answer to that question. It’s no (well, technically yes…he didn’t). President Obama taught "Con Law III" at Chicago. Judicial review, federalism, the separation of powers — the old "structural Constitution" stuff — is covered in "Con Law I" (or at least it was when I was a student). Con Law III covers the Fourteenth Amendment. (Oddly enough, Prof. Obama didn’t seem too concerned about “an unelected group of people” overturning a "duly constituted and passed law" when we were discussing all those famous Fourteenth Amendment cases – Roe v. Wade, Griswold v. Connecticut, Romer v. Evans, etc.) Of course, even a Con Law professor focusing on the Bill of Rights should know that the principle of judicial review has been alive and well since 1803, so I still feel like my educational credentials have been tarnished a bit by the President’s "unprecedented, extraordinary" remarks.

No comments:

Post a Comment