Many observers have argued that credit default swaps contributed significantly to the credit crisis. Of particular concern to these observers are that credit default swaps trade in the largely unregulated over-the-counter market as bilateral contracts involving counterparty risk and that they facilitate speculation involving negative views of a firm's financial strength. Some observers have suggested that credit default swaps would not have made the crisis worse had they been traded on exchanges. I conclude that credit default swaps did not cause the dramatic events of the credit crisis, that the over-the-counter credit default swaps market worked well during much of the first year of the credit crisis, and that exchange trading has both advantages and costs compared to over-the-counter trading. Though I argue that eliminating over-the-counter trading of credit default swaps could reduce social welfare, I also recognize that much research is needed to understand better and quantify the social gains and costs of derivatives in general and credit default swaps in particular. [hyperlink added]
Correcting misconceptions about markets, economics, asset prices, derivatives, equities, debt and finance
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Credit Default Swaps Did Not Contribute To The Recent Credit Crisis
Posted By Milton Recht
A research paper, "Credit Default Swaps and the Credit Crisis" by Rene M. Stulz, Ohio State University, Department of Finance, September 2009, NBER Working Paper No. w15384, argues:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment